Posted by: Yogi's Warrior | April 23, 2007

The Personal Cost For DD Becomes Clear and Cesc Is My Young Player Of The Year

Given the events of the week preceding, it is hardly surprising that there is very little transfer gossip in the Sundays. Which is quite good actually, perhaps it will stop the fantasy speculation. Indeed, the only story that they are interested in is the removal of David Dein from the Board and the fallout of that. The Sunday Times reckons that it now frees up the FA to pursue Arsene Wenger with their fullest vigour which is the stuff of nightmares as Brian Barwick is not the most photogenic of individuals. As Dein is no longer attached to a club, it seems his days of office holding are about to be curtailed, albeit until he returns to the Game. The G-14 are likely to be the first to react with DD being asked to step aside as their “Leader” as he is no longer affilated to a member of this self-styled elite group.

The FA themselves will be leaving DD in situ until June when he will need to relinquish his positions on the International Committee and representing the Premiership Clubs on the FA Council. Speculation as to what this will do for Arsenal is rife. Personally, I think it is pointless as the Club received very little benefit from his “political” posts otherwise we would not have lost so many players to suspension in March whilst the equally culpable Chelsea got off relatively scot-free.

There is a shortcut route back into these roles, well some of them anyway, if DD is desperate enough to desire them and it is one that may surface in due course. Daniel Commolli is rumoured to be on Arsene’s shortlist of candidates for the post of Director of Football at Arsenal. Is it too fanciful to believe that Dein would fill that role at Tottenham if Commolli moves across North London? In some respects it is not given his personal ties with Daniel Levy. In others it is given his supposed desire to return t o Arsenal. It was disappointing to read the comments attributed to him about getting revenge on the Arsenal board; one hopes that was ‘paper talk’.

Cesc Fabregas was unsurprisingly did not come up trumps in either of the Player Of The Year Awards last night, Ronaldo scooping both. Media hype made that one inevitable. Ronaldo has played well this season, that cannot be denied but the praise lavished has been embarrassing at times, grown men almost wetting their pants in their desire to make the most crass superlatives in print. The player deserves credit for consistency and having the ‘bottle’ to face up his critics in the media following on from the last World Cup. It is indicative of the poor season that the Arsenal have had this term that not one of the players has made it to the PFA Team of the Year. The only non-Manchester United players in the XI were Gerrard, Berbatov and Drogba. It is not something that you can argue with particularly for the only two candidates could possibly be Toure and Fabregas. It is however a rarity under Wenger’s reign for none to be in this team selected by their peer.

Interesting thoughts from Alan Smith in this morning’s Daily Telegraph. He argues that the summer will not see the influx of new signings that everyone and his dog seems to want, intimating that AW has a transfer budget of £5m. Whilst he has picked that figure from the air, I am sure, it will make this close season very uncomfortable for the current Board if it turns out that Wenger has an exceptionally modest transfer budget when they have previously said that he has more than enough funds to spend. Of course, he could always sell Phillipe Senderos to Juventus for £7m as is being reported in places. Whilst the Italians have money to burn most summers, I find it hard to believe that they would put that much on the table for Big Phil. Still the transfer market must be having a dose of hyper inflation as a couple of weeks ago he was only worth £2m.

Finally, congratulations to the Arsenal Ladies for winning the first leg of their UEFA Cup Final in Sweden and a clean sheet as well. 1 – 0 to the Arsenal almost harks back to a bye-gone age.

‘Til tomorrow.


Responses

  1. I cannot help feeling that PHW and his band have not put the success of the club first in this affair. That they have acted on behalf of the major shareholders there is no doubt. On behalf of the supporters and players ..I am not so sure. The relationship DD had with AW and the players alone should have caused the Board to think a thousand times before taking a self-destructive action. AW may be clever and a workaholic but there not enough hours in the day for him to devote time to appointing another ‘Director of Football’ or to negotiating transfers, contracts, partnerships with other institutions etc, unless he reins back his football work (not an option surely).

    One intriguing side effect of all of this is that AW has become an even more powerful figure in the club. It would be worth thinking that one through over the coming days and weeks.

    On the supposed DD comments about revenge. There are more than enough Tottenham fans in that particulalr community and in the media (as evidenced by the Bevern debacle) to shed a healthy degree of suspicion on any stories of that nature.

  2. On the subject of AW’s growing power, there was an off the cuff comment last week on that very subject. The speculation was that instead of becoming a Director of Football when he retires, the Board may be more inclined to offer him the Chairman’s post.

    The Board have backed themselves into a corner by imposing a twelve month deadline to suit Danny Fiszman’s Tax Status. There is a way out to allow KSE to takeover the Club – mop up all of the other shares and allow DF to keep his until his tax exile becomes effective.

    However, stubborn pride will probably preclude this happening and a long drawn out media slugfest is about to commence.

  3. Surely the current board have to losen the apron strings this summer if they are to win the PR battle with any takeover.

    Funny thing about Dein is now he is no longer a board member at Arsenal he is not conflicted in his roles at the FA.

    I suspect we won’t see him at White Heart Lane, Levy is too clever for that ENIC also have their own agenda.

    As for Wenger for England I don’t get it the press have been lining up to kick Wenger this season for irrational behaviour why would he want to expose himself to that. His skill is finding foreign talent (he can’t do that with England) and tactically his brand of football has suposedly been cracked by Hughes, Koeman, Fat Sam et al.

    If the press are looking for a suitable new manager for England what about Sir Alex or Maureen both of whom already manage England Players!

  4. It looks like the board had very little choice in letting Dein go if some of the stories are to be believed.

    One cannot have an “insider” from a hostile bidder sitting on the board, and if that was the case, it would have left the board in an untenable position.

    Obviously it’s pure speculation, but if Dein saw a Kroenke bid as a route to the Chairman’s seat on the Arsenal board, then that would explain Hill-Woods rather personal take on things.

    A lot seems to be being made of the 30% threshold, and also of the 1 year “no sale” agreement.

    It must be noted here that the 30% threshold is not some magic point at which a takeover bid becomes unstoppable. It’s merely a legislative breakpoint that compells the shareholder attaining that percentage holding to make an offer to all other shareholders.

    This is more of a burden on the 30% shareholder than anyone else. Firstly, he has to offer the maximum price he obtained any of shares at to all the other shareholders so it’s not a cheap route, and secondly, he has to have the funds available to make good if everyone decides to take him up on it.

    However, the other shareholders are not compelled to sell to him at that point, and in fact that’s exactly what happened to Glazer, he only succeeded on his 3rd attempt I believe?

    That’s an awfull lot of money to have hanging in the balance while this all plays out, especially if there is no light at the end of the tunnel.

    The one year agreement to “not sell” is a fairly standard tactic and time period for a block of shareholders to agree to in order to resist a hostile takeover, so I wouldn’t read much into the time period at all.

    The fact that 45% of the shareholders are standing together does make this a rather difficult proposition for Kroenke to mount a hostile bid. This is very different to the Manu situation, where there were many independent shareholders, and certain large ones had agreed to sell anyway.

    It’s really now a bluffing game, and if the 45% block do actually stick together, then yes, Kroenke can make life difficult, but he will not exactly have an easy ride either, especially if he has to rely on banks to back his bid, which I am pretty sure he will have to do. (It’s not a simple matter to transfer vast sums of money between countries even if you do have the ready cash, which I doubt he does).

    The current shareholders have not declared a dividend for a very long time, so it certainly isn’t a case of short-term investors bailing out at the first hint of a wad of cash.

    In fact, even if they do intend to sell, they would be wise to hold on and realise the value brought about by the increased revenue streams from both the new TV deal and the new stadium. To sell out now based purelu on potential would be to sell themselves short imo, that’s why there have been so many new “investors” recently, they are trying to get in while the clubs are still undervalued.

    I don’t know how this will all pan out, but it will be interesting to see if Kroenke tries to bluff it through or has the patience to hang in. We might well see one or other party tire and plan an exit strategy of some sort.

    It’s funny, but the same idea about Dein going to spurs also occured to me, especially considering the link with Dein and Levy’s kids, but that might be a bridge too far.

    The FA are a complete joke. I cannot even vaguely understand why they think it was Dein who prevented Wenger from taking up the England job.

    Wenger has stated on more than one occasion he has turned far more attractive international propositions down before and really doesn’t fancy coaching an international side at all.

    He has only ever been even vaguely positive about it when he has been joking or trying to mollify the rabid morons in the media.

    They really are like a spotty teenager fixated on some girl who really has no interest in them at all.

    In all seriousness, and I imagine Wenger is well aware of this to, he really is not a suitable cnadidate for the job anyway.

    Unless the FA intend guaranteeing him 10-15 years with complete control to change the entire way they go about nurturing the youth and training them, there really isn’t any point.

    Wenger’s strengths are his vision, organisational skills and long term training methods, none of which would fit in to the current setup with the England team.

    In actual fact, the best candidate for the job currently managing an EPL side is actually Mourinho.

    He has very strong tactical nous, he is good at motivating and gelling his teams in the short term, and would be ideal as a pragmatic coach who would get the best results out of what is available.

    I think the media and fans delude themselves greatly as to the quality of the current England “talent pool”, but I have no doubt Mourinho would get the best out of them that could be got at this stage.

    It seems to me that old Svennis was a lot better than he was given credit for……………………………….

    Failing getting Mourinho, the best choice would be fat sam, and I would certainly enjoy that seeing as I am not an England fan. :-)

  5. Mike

    It is too much of a coincidence to me that DF will be a bona fide tax exile in twelve months to be ignored. With his age and the time constraints on visiting the UK (92 days each year, I believe) it is going to be difficult for him to be anything more than a passive investor over time, if he still attends all of the home games.

    As for England, I would agree with Mourinho as Manager. AW would be more suited as the Technical Director in charge of the long term development of England’s youth players through to International Level, and effectively being Mourinho’s Boss….

    YW

  6. I am sure that ultimately Kroenke will win in his bid for ownership. DD could stick around for long enough to become the new Chairman or President. After all he is an Arsenal supporter through and through and of course he has substantial shares in club. If he is sensible he will not sell his own shares until Danny Fiszman hands over his shares. I guess the real question is whether DD can hang on for a year or so whilst DF sorts out his tax status. Shocking if that is what we are all waiting for!

    I am sure that Bracewell-Smith and Carr are joined at the hip to PHW…and there lies the rub. Young Mister Grace may have thrown his rattle out of the pram over the Chairmanship. I sincerely hope that PHW is not trying to break DD before he himself bows to the inevitable. That can only be very bad for the club. When we speak of revenge I wonder just who is taking out revenge on who. Christ this is like a cross between Are You Being Served and bloody Dallas…hated both series. …rather watch football.

    I really do hope we have Kroenke, Dein and Wenger in charge soon. A year is just too long to wait.

  7. Dein’s son is married to David Buchler’s daughter (a former Spud vice chairman) not Levy’s (Levy is 44 years old) his eldest son is 17 his 2 daughters are under age. Dein is very matey with Irvine Scholar again a former Spurs man.

    Agree whole heartedly about the England manager’s job. Wenger could take a head of technical development role but team coach seems unlikely. Fat Sam, if my sources are correct, is more likely to be fighting a criminal court case for tax evasion related to the bung allegations in the near future.

  8. Sorry YW, missed your last bit. Can’t see AW going anywhere near England management…except perhaps as an advisor to someone he respects, and if he believes that this will improve the quality of football at club level.

  9. Well Vivb those people or similar are probably the source of the DD revenge (sic) story. They probably see it as a bit of ribaldry or jocularity between friends. Trouble is some of their friends are media people. F****** B******s.

  10. [...] The Personal Cost For DD Becomes Clear and Cesc Is My Young Player Of The Year Given the events of the week preceding, it is hardly surprising that there is very little transfer gossip in the […] [...]


Categories