Posted by: Yogi's Warrior | March 4, 2007

Samba You Win…

Arsenal 2 - 1 Reading

1 - 0 Gilberto (pen) (49)
2 - 0 Baptista (61)
2 - 1 Fabregas (o.g.) (87)

After a week that in some quarters was described as ‘traumatic‘, Arsenal put their mini-blip to bed and secured three important points in the race for third place, a race which has taken a turn to Arsenal’s advantage this weekend but a race that cannot be taken for granted given the twists and turns that still remain to be taken. A simple equation to win that particular sprint is that Arsenal need to win their two games in hand on Liverpool to have a five point advantage with a visit to Anfield and Chelsea to visit The Emirates, Liverpool have by comparison a more straightforward run-in, their trickiest game by comparison is a visit to Fratton Park. One thing is certain though that this season, Arsenal have reserved their best for the important games.

As is the norm at The Emirates, a late goal occurred to change the complexion of the game. Except this time it was not for the home side but Reading who set up a frantic final five minutes. Cesc Fabregas’ deft flick gave the visitors hope and but for a Lehmann save from Sidwell, they would have returned home with an ill-deserved point. Did I say ‘deft flick‘? More lazy and limp than any artistry involved, responding to the movement of his Forward than anything else. And that summed up Arsenal’s defensive problems in the last quarter of the game; too often the midfield made loose passes - Hleb at fault for the corner from which Reading scored - creating pressure that the team did not need.

That though overshadows the rest of the game; Reading came not to defend deep and hope to nick a goal. Setting out with two forwards precludes that option and Steve Coppell deserves credit - acknowledged by Arsene afterwards - for at least having ‘go’ at winning. It was a typical home performance this season; plenty of possession, chances abounding and lacklustre finishing. At the end of the day though, who cares? Three defeats in four meant that a win was the most important objective, to relieve that pressure from Wednesday night. Arsene threw a team selection from left field in defence, opting to start with Gilberto in the heart of the defence rather than Senderos who was relegated to the bench. In the Brazilians place in the centre of the field was Denilson who once again did not disappoint. It was heartening as well to see Diaby enter the fray later in the game, duly recovered from his ankle-knack in last Sunday’s Carling Cup Final; another of Arsene’s famous underestimations of the powers of recovery of his charges. Up front, Theo Walcott was given the start in his favoured position and showed the potential as a Premiership striker that made Arsene sign him in the first place, alongside Julio ‘JCB’ Baptista, who for me had his best game in The Emirates.

That the match was goalless for so long is in no small part due to Marcus Hahneman in the Reading goal. In keeping with what is becoming an unwelcome tradition at The Emirates, the visitors keeper had a blinder although in some circumstances it was poor control that helped him on his way. Oh, and the Arsenal attempt to have the worst miss of the season sewn up by Easter, Fabregas air-shot the latest attempt but not quite as bad as Rosicky’s against CSKA. Hahneman saved well from Walcott, Ljungberg and an excellent save from Fabregas’ rasper. What encouraged me more than anything though was that the speed and accuracy of passing was not lost through the run of defeats instilling a lack of confidence; far from it, the team continued to play in the manner to which we have become accustomed.

The goals themselves came at the right time, if there is ever a wrong time to score. Having gone through a goalless fifty minutes, doubts started to creep in to some minds about whether this was to be a continuation of the goal-shyness of recent times. Clichy started the move that led to the penalty award, running seventy yards into the Reading area before being clumsily being sent crashing by Bikey. With Gilberto as the taker, there was never any guarantee of a goal but the penalty was despatched with consumate professionalism. This highlights one of the attributes that I like with him as Captain, he is there willing to stand up and be counted despite taking one of the worst penalties in living memory at Bolton. This one was a lesson in the art, low powerful and into the corner; not many ‘keepers can stop those although Hahneman had a good try. The second owed more to Baptista’s physique than any Brazilian ball control, Murty allowing him to muscle through before toe-poking into the net, a welcome goal but I notice not enough to stop people having a ‘pop’ at him; to assume he is an out-and-out striker is wrong, even his major season at Sevilla was as a second striker. Unlike Bergkamp and Pires he is not blessed with magnificent close control but some of that is due to not playing every week. A welcome goal that one hopes will be the start of a scoring run.

The Sunday’s contain the usual tittle-tattle; Fabregas is still off to Spain apparently whilst Adebayor is adamant that he is being courted by Chelsea and Manchester United. Curiously enough, the quotes attributed to him also mention that he expects Arsenal to reward him for his ‘new status in the team‘. Methinks his Mr 15% may need to keep his mouth firmly shut if he thinks that the Club will bow down to such attempted blackmail, no matter how feeble it may be. Oh, and apparentaly Arsene can’t get enough of crocked centre-halves, Jonathon Woodgate being monitored closely by Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester United and Blyth Spartans.

Finally, hats off to John Rawlings on Radio 5Live’s ‘Fighting Talk’ programme yesterday morning; in response to the question, ‘who behaved the most disgracefully in last weekend’s Caring Cup Final‘, his response of ‘The Commentators‘ says it all.

Responses

I believe given the opportunity Baptista will be a valuable asset to Arsenal. I agree with you and so does Baptista himself actually, that he works best as a second striker. People also tend to forget that he does actually get into positions to at least have shots on target. People seem to be targeting Julio as perhaps unproven but I would rather look at Arsenal’s misplaced passes which have led to goals been conceded against them recently.

But to be a second striker, you have to be intelligent and the vision to see runs etc. Several times yesterday he insisted on dribbling past defenders instead of a pass to a player in a good position. He deffinetly gets into good positions but when he does his touch and control lets him down. Yesterday wasn’t as bad as other days however. I think he should cut out trying to do all the skills and things and just do the simple things well…the simple way and do quick passes. Several times Ljumburg got into good positions and Baptista either passed it to late or too soon.

I guess we will see after a couple more matches, but he has played 3/4 games in a row and you cannot use the ‘he doesn’t play week in week out’ excuse all the time now, because now really is the best time for him to improve with all our injuries to our strikers. I still do not think Wenger will keep him.

Baptista will come good.

Fans are way too impatient. If AW was as fickle and impatient as the fans, Henry, Bergkamp, Pires and others would never have been around long enough to become greats.

Baotista has what it takes. Yesterday was the first time he’s started with Freddie, they were both clearly not on the same wavelength, but Baptista does put in some visionary passes, and his touch is no worse right now than many others in the team.

It will all come with game time and confidence. Have faith, The Beast will be immense for us.

On another note, has anyone noticed the LMA trying “interview” AW?

Funny, I don’t recall him asking for their help?!?

More and more managers are cautiously expressing sympathy and agreement with AW, this is starting to get legs, it is obviously a festering sore in the game from several people’s points of view, they’ve just been too scared to say anything.

This smacks of a campaign by the FA.

First get in a couple of character assassination shots (barber and other slime).

Call up your mates in the press to slag AW off and pass out a few red-herrings and change the gist of the “report” a bit to try and discredit AW.
Then try and get people to give AW a “way out” by claiming his English is maybe not so good.

Finally, call your mates in the game, the LMA. Get them to call AW up and “persaude” him that they’re “on his side” but for the good of the game he should accept censure and a fine, and if possible apologise, so the pigs can stay with their snouts in the trough.

I think the FA can see that they have painted themselves into a corner, and they are desperately trying to find a way out.

If this goes to court, the FA are going to be cremated, and I hope it does.

It’s time this festering sore was removed from the game.

Chris Coleman made an interesting observation this morning that the FA expect that a manager will be expected to apologise if he is wrong but there is never one coming the other way. This is backed up by Poll on Wednesday; did he apologise for getting the penalty-that-was-never-given wrong? No, just a lame arse excuse about watching the upper bodies.

I don’t think the FA bothered phoning the press; they are quite happy to slag Wenger off at the drop of a hat and don’t need anyone to tell them that this is a good opportunity to do so. The LMA are ineffectual when it comes to representing managers at disciplinary hearings; when was the last time they criticised the Referees for getting so much wrong.

This won’t go to Court. Arsene will be fined and banned from the touchline for three - five games and more likely, be advised by the Board to accept the decision and say no more about it.

If that happens, the game will continue to decline.

The FA have no place administering the game, neither do UEFA or FIFA.

Thay all have a major conflict of interest in that they have a product, international football, that not only has a parasitic relationship with club football, but actually also is in competition with club football.

As AW has said, they are trying to damage the quality of club football to try and make their product more competitive.

As such, they cannot sit in a position of power higher than the clubs in the game.

They should be on the same level as the clubs, and fall under the administration of a higher entity that does not have these conflicting interests.

AW seems pretty determined about this, and I don’t think the board will stand in his way if he really wants to go for it, otherwise he will leave.

AW saw this same rubbish at Monaco, and I’m pretty sure he’s determined to stamp it out here now.

If the FA continue trying to bluster and bully their way through this (and what choice do they have? They lack the intelligence or the moral fibre to alter course), then AW’s case will be even further strengthened.

The FA are patently wrong, and I think they are starting to fear where this is going.

Absolutely agree with you Mike. The administration of the game seems to get more corrupt the higher you go.

However I doubt that anyone has the moral courage to back Arsene on this other than perhaps the Board.

This is not new, black has been white with the authorities for years & years, with justice the lowest of priorities.

On the playing front, perfect example TH14 disallowed goal & booking against CSK. You couldn’t change the result I agree, but to have no way of challenge the booking, which cost us his services in a crucial game? They don’t care.

I’m not sure that the Club wants him to say anymore, fearful of further penalties against him. Whilst they may agree that there is a ‘bias’ - perceived or real - they also do not want to get drawn into a slanging match with the Authorities.

This type of complaint though is one we’ve had in the past after the melee’s in matches against United and Norwich, where it felt as if the Governing Bodies were lined up against the Club. Nothing changed then and it won’t now.

A fundamental problem is that FIFA is hell-bent on giving Referees an almost Papal Infallibility which makes going up against them very difficult indeed and is one reason why there has previously been resistance to Video Technology. The IFAB has approved the use of Goal Line Technology so perhaps that particular worm is turning. Don’t expect it to be a quick turn, more one akin to the turning circle of an extremely large Canal Boat.

Are the actions are the FA corrupt or just incompetent? The former implies dishonesty for personal gain and that does not completely ring true. There is nothing to gain from singling out one Club from their point of view; that will not bring the rest into line nor will it stop that Club re-offending.

None of the Clubs in the G-14 are prepared to strike out (yet) on their own and form a Super League - I guess the sums of money involved are not yet big enough - and even then, is it just going to be the case of another set of incompetents running the game?

As for the Structure of the International Game, FIFA are supposed to be the overseer of Football in the World. The problem is that they have a President who has 101 ideas a day and all of them are bad. From that perspective, they just allow such ineptitude to tumble downwards. FIFA will never cede control of their Competitions because they budget over a four year cycle with the World Cup funding them. How else can they survive?

It is the people making the rules who are the problem not the structure but can the Clubs do it any better?

I don’t think the clubs can neccessarily do it better, but who knows, they can’t really do it any worse imo.

I don’t think that the FA is neccessarily corrupt in my understanding of that term.

I do think they are dishonest though, and I think that’s fairly easily proven.

They do suffer from delusions about having to adhere to the laws of the land, witness their guilt regarding price collusion, a criminal offence.

It’s funny, they are now having their lap dogs come out with what I consider the last resort of authorities who have no moral ground left.

Some moron came out with “Wenger is not bigger than the game”.

I have seen this often, usually concerning rugby, and it’s always brought out when authorities have no logical or moral turf left.

It’s almost always muttered by an administrative figure who seems to be under the fond impression that he IS the game.

The Rugby comparison is quite a good one; they make the FA look like an efficient organisation at times. I’ve lost count of the number of arguments between the RFU and the Clubs, usually neither ‘wins’ and both look exceptionally incompetent.

You are right about the administrators though; usually their egos overtake their intelligence when it comes to dealing with matters to do with the Game. The frightening thing is though that the Government are threatening to appoint an Ombudsman to oversee the game if the FA do not implement the Burns Report Recommendations. Scary stuff especially when you have to go back to the mid-70’s to find a decent Minister of Sport, someone who actually administrated at a high level in football rather than the usual populist pup that we’ve had since then.

I cannot believe that someone actually said, ‘Wenger is not bigger than the game’ especially given the circumstances. One thing I have not seen Arsene show is rampant egotism! Provocative thoughts he may have but debate is stifled within the game unless the Authorities come out looking good.

When I use the word “corrupt” perhaps it’s a bit like Arsene’s “liar”. What I mean is “morally depraved”. Not because of the saucy secretary but because they distort matters to suit themselves and have not been worthy guardians of the game.

Indeed this has been going on for years & years but so far everyone has accepted it.

I’d certainly go along with that definition!

These are the same clowns who built an ostentatious and excessive stadium that they couldn’t afford and couldn’t manage in order to have something to brag about at cocktail parties instead of investing money in an academy to develop the youth.

These guys are totally clueless.

Even fat sam (who I really cannot abide) seems to know that there are fundamental problems with the national game, and that there is no quick fix.

The morons in the FA seem to be like a pimply teenager with AW, and seem to fondly imagine that Wenger could just walk in and make the England team successful overnight.

Wenger has now rejected them a few times, and I surmise that’s one of the reasons they have it in for him.

They lack the intellect and the knowledge to work out that Wenger would not be able to do that for them, but like a pimply teenager who has been rejected, they seem to think that if they act like a spiteful idiot, the object of their affections will suddenly change their mind and do what they want.

The FA should be allowed to manage “club England”, but further than that they have no place in the game, and they absolutely are not fit to be in a position of authority in the game.

It is funny that the supposed FA’s favourite for the England job and supposedly only stopped from taking the job by Dein is now in branded in sections of the press as a complete loony.

I think the trouble that Wenger made was use the term “Liar” rather than “mistake”. Chris Coleman suggests the same that Wenger and Mourniho are both non-native English speakers and sometimes use innappropriate words. Wenger’s interview yesterday mentions his difficulty being subtle with words. Indeed in the press conference after the Blackburn game he stated that in his mind the linesman lied if he stated something that was incorrect, most people would probably say the linesman like Poll just made a mistake.

The FA seem to have developed this reputation for being Morally Bankrupt and Intellectually Vacuous. I’d better get over there for a job then…

Yeh!!!

I might qualify too.

Have you seen the rabid Man Utd/Celtic fan Hugh McIlvanney’s column in the Sunday Times.

Has any journo actually looked at the issues involved. Why do they want to protect the FA?

The telegraph quote Coppell in the paper this morning. He refers to the Politics in the Media with papers and broadcasters favouring particular big teams. He compares yesterday’s press coverage to a Party Political Broadcast on behalf of particular Big teams.

Funny as Scholes air punch gets no comment, Alan Hansen even suggested that he started to punch then though better of it, and that it was out of character. Anyone who has watched Scholes in several of the games against us in the last few seasons will know that not to be the case.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories